Now be honest...Do you really think Crysis Gameplay is better than CoD Gameplay?

Crysis (plus Warhead and Crysis Wars) is pretty enjoyable: perfect Graphics, Sound, Physics Engine and more! But... You can't define an FPS game like other genres that the their Gameplay value is practically the same as sound value or graphics especially when we're talking about one of the best game of the year or so. The Gameplay importance in FPS games should be nearly decisive in reviews, Shame it isn't. Anyway, I'm starting this discussion because of other discussion that started here called Crysis just isn't good and, to my surprise, most of the comments tried to prove that the writer of the thread is totally wrong!I really don't get it how people who played CoD/UO, CoD2 and CoD4 (in case they really did) can say Crysis is much better only because of its Graphics, Sound and Physics in spite of the fact that (I really can't argue about that) any CoD Gamelpay vs Crysis Gameplay --- The count to one million and, apparently, can not be compared.Now be honest...Do you really think Crysis Gameplay is better than CoD Gameplay?
Compared to CoD the singleplayer gameplay in Crysis has a lot more replay value. Imo singleplayer in any CoD is only playable the first time around, once you've seen the complete scripted singleplayer campaign you've seen it all. Even though Crysis does have its scripted moments, its ultimately up to the player to decide how they want to complelte the objectives in each level.I've only finished the singleplayer campaign of CoD4 once, It was honeslty quite a bore after about 3/4 the way through. However I've kept coming back to Crysis many times and found myself playing the game in completely differently ways, finding myself in some really intense situations that I never encoutered the first time I played it. Now be honest...Do you really think Crysis Gameplay is better than CoD Gameplay?
[QUOTE=''pinneyapple''] Compared to CoD the singleplayer gameplay in Crysis has a lot more replay value. Imo singleplayer in any CoD is only playable the first time around, once you've seen the complete scripted singleplayer campaign you've seen it all. Even though Crysis does have its scripted moments, its ultimately up to the player to decide how they want to complelte the objectives in each level.I've only finished the singleplayer campaign of CoD4 once, It was honeslty quite a bore after about 3/4 the way through. However I've kept coming back to Crysis many times and found myself playing the game in completely differently ways, finding myself in some really intense situations that I never encoutered the first time I played it. [/QUOTE]Although the Single-Player of Crysis is intense, its gameplay unimproved and the plot is pretty boring though I meant to the Multi-Player.
Yeah, SP-wise, Crysis wins this hands down.So much more replayable, intense and dynamic.
well, i think Crysis is much more fun than CoD. in singleplayer they cant be compared, CoD is nothing in singleplayer.in multiplayer, nowadays CoD4 is really popular but still i dont think its great. what i see is people liked calling air strike or other extra additions in multiplayer. Crysis multiplayer was not liked much because its maps were huge and majority of fps gamers want to kill and kill and kill more enemies almost instantly. so crysis multiplayer was not suitable for fast deathmatch kinda games, but i think its multiplayer was more fun than cod4 because nanosuit features and strategy gamelike vehicle production were more different than any fps. even only nanosuit powers are enough fun but just like i said now, since maps are huge you cant use those powers much/fast. imo Crysis is better than CoD in everyway but obviously Crysis multiplayer needs lots of people to enjoy it.
COD4 is more impressive its cinematic quality particularly due to things like voice acting, the score and scripted moments. On the hardest difficulty it is a very intense game.Crysis has more replay value perhaps if you wanted to experiment with those different suit tricks, though the outcome of the game will be the same no matter what etc.Multiplayer: its not contest which is the better game there.
I've played every Call of Duty and I'd say they're a hell of a lot more intense than Crysis and Crysis Warhead. Not to take anything away from the Crysis games, they're great. Call of Duty though is just a level above when it comes to the single player campaign. There are just so many YOU'VE GOT TO BE KIDDING moments in the Call of Duty games. For me the most intense moment in any single player game was the bomb and what happened in the helicopter afterwards in CoD 4. That was just plain crazy!
i enjoyted the gameplay of both. Great action, gunplay, effects. but the overall winner is Crysis because it brings so much more to the table. At the end of the day CoD will always be a respawn circus show while Crysis is not. It gives and gives the more you put into it.
[QUOTE=''CellAnimation'']I've played every Call of Duty and I'd say they're a hell of a lot more intense than Crysis and Crysis Warhead. Not to take anything away from the Crysis games, they're great. Call of Duty though is just a level above when it comes to the single player campaign. There are just so many YOU'VE GOT TO BE KIDDING moments in the Call of Duty games. For me the most intense moment in any single player game was the bomb and what happened in the helicopter afterwards in CoD 4. That was just plain crazy![/QUOTE]I strongly agree with you! And, in some aspects, Only those who played (or still playing) any CoD would probably say that CoD is much better. I don't say who think Crysis is better didn't play CoD or CoD2 but lets leave it as like that...
[QUOTE=''crazyfist36''] i enjoyted the gameplay of both. Great action, gunplay, effects. but the overall winner is Crysis because it brings so much more to the table. At the end of the day CoD will always be a respawn circus show while Crysis is not. It gives and gives the more you put into it.[/QUOTE]Gives what?I still don't get it how can someone say that Crysis Gameplay is much more professional while it is not, perhaps it's a fast-FPS but CoD is much more professional (I'm pointing mostly on CoD and CoD2 now).
[QUOTE=''BontraXenderKyl''][QUOTE=''CellAnimation'']I've played every Call of Duty and I'd say they're a hell of a lot more intense than Crysis and Crysis Warhead. Not to take anything away from the Crysis games, they're great. Call of Duty though is just a level above when it comes to the single player campaign. There are just so many YOU'VE GOT TO BE KIDDING moments in the Call of Duty games. For me the most intense moment in any single player game was the bomb and what happened in the helicopter afterwards in CoD 4. That was just plain crazy![/QUOTE]I strongly agree with you! And, in some aspects, Only those who played (or still playing) any CoD would probably say that CoD is much better. I don't say who think Crysis is better didn't play CoD or CoD2 but lets leave it as like that...[/QUOTE]That's still an unfounded assumption. I've played CoD, CoD2 and CoD4 (with CoD being the only one I thought was actually worthy of an AAA score) and I say that Crysis beats all of them when it comes down to the base gameplay.I've never had so much fun in FPS combat. If there's one thing I absolutely hate in the CoD series, it's the fact that I have virtually no choices whatsover in dealing with combat situations. I'm always funnelled into the same fighting style over and over again, with deviations so minor they might as well not exist. In Crysis I can do almost anything to win in a combat situation, including not actually fighting. CoD can't let me do that, even though the original one had some crazy firefights... the newer ones are just bland, mindless and unimaginative in my opinion.
[QUOTE=''aliblabla2007'']That's still an unfounded assumption. I've played CoD, CoD2 and CoD4 (with CoD being the only one I thought was actually worthy of an AAA score) and I say that Crysis beats all of them when it comes down to the base gameplay.I've never had so much fun in FPS combat. If there's one thing I absolutely hate in the CoD series, it's the fact that I have virtually no choices whatsover in dealing with combat situations. I'm always funnelled into the same fighting style over and over again, with deviations so minor they might as well not exist. In Crysis I can do almost anything to win in a combat situation, including not actually fighting. CoD can't let me do that, even though the original one had some crazy firefights... the newer ones are just bland, mindless and unimaginative in my opinion. [/QUOTE] But surely you wouldn't expect stealth sections in COD? The game is all about heavily scripted cinematic action, as if it were a action/thriller film and the games really perfect that formula. Also, how do you find the firefights in the ''newer ones'' - excluding COD3 here - to be any different from the first game?It is futile in comparing the COD series and Crysis given that they are made for different purposes (despite being shooters).
[QUOTE=''biggest_loser'']But surely you wouldn't expect stealth sections in COD?[/QUOTE] CoD and CoD4 had stealth missions, but in Crysis you can turn into a Predator at will. And you can fail at it, if you're not careful with your timing and planning, because the cloak's energy is limited. CoD really holds your hand, doesn't force you to ''plan out'' your stealth because there's always some instructions on what to do, and it's very clear. [QUOTE=''biggest_loser''] The game is all about heavily scripted cinematic action, as if it were a action/thriller film and the games really perfect that formula. Also, how do you find the firefights in the ''newer ones'' - excluding COD3 here - to be any different from the first game?It is futile in comparing the COD series and Crysis given that they are made for different purposes (despite being shooters). [/QUOTE]That is why we have and voice opinions. And overall, my opinion is that Crysis's dynamic, open-ended way to play through the overall linear campaign is better than Call of Duty's ''interactive movie'' formula. I don't play MP, but I love me some good lasting value - and for me, Crysis's gameplay provides more lasting value and replayability than a game using the Call of Duty formula could ever be able to.About the firefights - I've told you before, the combat in CoD2/CoD4 just felt too slow and tame compared to the craziness that CoD1 had.
Lets take it to a different aspect:Which one of them has the best MP (in case you're attributing the gameplay much importance)?
[QUOTE=''BontraXenderKyl'']Lets take it to a different aspect:Which one of them has the best MP (in case you're attributing the gameplay much importance)?[/QUOTE]Probably Call of Duty 4, but I don't play MP anyway so it doesn't matter at all to me.
[QUOTE=''aliblabla2007''][QUOTE=''BontraXenderKyl''] Lets take it to a different aspect:Which one of them has the best MP (in case you're attributing the gameplay much importance)?[/QUOTE]Probably Call of Duty 4, but I don't play MP anyway so it doesn't matter at all to me. [/QUOTE]Exactly! oh you don't play MP... Anyway, That's what I'm talking about, the phenomenal gameplay in the MP!
I did not like the COD 4 single player experience, nor the previous installments of what I've played. My complaint is that I'm just reading lines from a script, following invisible orders, running from a to b where my only real choices feel like who I'm shooting at first, what weapon I use and how to run from this grenade indicator.I don't like games where there are obvious spawn points for enemies who run to a window, get shot, run to a window, get shot. Then alternate between windows, then doors. It's boring, unintelligent, overly scripted and just plain sad. I stand by the fact that is does nothing for single player shooters and takes them backwards. Why do i LOVE games like Half-Life but near detest games like COD 4 is quite a conundrum, my thoughts are partly to do with the reliance of creating ''fake'' environmental ''events'' just to make you feel in a warzone. Every shooter does this absolutely, but COD series have too many of these. I think also the respawn factor, COD games go overboard with respawning X enemies then moving to the next area.COD 4 multiplayer though is great, why? Because you take out the respawn, the scripted rubbish. It's all cause and effect by players inside the game which makes it great.Crysis SP > COD 4 MP >>> Crysis MP > COD 4 SP
[QUOTE=''BontraXenderKyl''][QUOTE=''crazyfist36''] i enjoyted the gameplay of both. Great action, gunplay, effects. but the overall winner is Crysis because it brings so much more to the table. At the end of the day CoD will always be a respawn circus show while Crysis is not. It gives and gives the more you put into it.[/QUOTE]Gives what?I still don't get it how can someone say that Crysis Gameplay is much more professional while it is not, perhaps it's a fast-FPS but CoD is much more professional (I'm pointing mostly on CoD and CoD2 now).[/QUOTE]a fast fps? CoD more professional? Tell me more about what you mean by these statements.
[QUOTE=''nutcrackr''] Crysis SP > COD 4 MP >>> Crysis MP > COD 4 SP [/QUOTE]Yes, but you can't spend a lot of time playing the same game over and over again (Crysis SP).
SP wise, crysis is soo much better than CoD. Crysis has non linear levels with room within to progress how choose, decent AI, actual physics and some actual substance to its gameplay. Unfortunately CoD pisses me off with its highly static enviroments, extremely linear levels and cheap spawning enemies, it feels more like a shooting gallery.However online CoD is fun and addicting(probably wins here) but not much substance where as crysis i havnt played it online so i can't talk!