I'm looking for FPS that can Create a Character

:oops: I'm looking for FPS that can Create a Character or Customise not in online games I try to search and find game like this for long time but I can' found any of them . So if you know what games like this please tell me please thank you for reading.:DThank you :DI'm looking for FPS that can Create a Character
Unreal Tournament 3 has a rather basic Character Customisation thingy.Can't really think of anything else.
If you aren't playing it online why do you NEED a custom character though? xD
Since it's a First Person Shooter you aren't gonna see the character :PI'm looking for FPS that can Create a Character
rainbow six vegas 2 had character customization
[QUOTE=''kieranb2000'']Unreal Tournament 3 has a rather basic Character Customisation thingy.Can't really think of anything else.
If you aren't playing it online why do you NEED a custom character though? xD
Since it's a First Person Shooter you aren't gonna see the character :P[/QUOTE]this, why do you want to be able tocustomize if you cant see them:?rpgs always have customisation, and they are often done from first person. see morrowind or oblivion in farcry 2 you can choose from a selection of about 7 or 8 characters.
There's mass effect where you can see your character's face that you made
[QUOTE=''zerosaber456'']There's mass effect where you can see your character's face that you made[/QUOTE]yes this is a good recomendation. as long as you have a pc that can run it decently.
I think that Fallout 3 is what you're looking for. It is a combination between the classic FPS and RPG. and it got a solid 9/10 here on Gamespot. You should try it out.
Mass Effect! It's not first-person, but it's a much better shooter than most pure shooters are.
[QUOTE=''succulent_toes'']Mass Effect! It's not first-person, but it's a much better shooter than most pure shooters are.[/QUOTE]Mass Effect is a nice game by itself, but the action isn't a strong part of it. There is no hit system in Mass Effect, so it doesn't matter if you hit the head or the feet. Mass Effect has in no way better action than most shooters. However to answer the OPs question:System Shock 2BioshockDeus ExFallout 3 (can customize appearance too)
[QUOTE=''sp1r1t''][QUOTE=''succulent_toes'']Mass Effect! It's not first-person, but it's a much better shooter than most pure shooters are.[/QUOTE]Mass Effect is a nice game by itself, but the action isn't a strong part of it. There is no hit system in Mass Effect, so it doesn't matter if you hit the head or the feet. Mass Effect has in no way better action than most shooters. However to answer the OPs question: System Shock 2BioshockDeus ExFallout 3 (can customize appearance too) [/QUOTE] I disagree. Doom doesn't have a hit detection system, and it's still way better than most shooters out today. Hit detection system does not equal good shooter. I had more fun with Mass Effect's combat than I did most shooters I've played. Certainly, Mass Effect had far, far better shooting than did any of the games you listed.
[QUOTE=''succulent_toes''][QUOTE=''sp1r1t''][QUOTE=''succulent_toes'']Mass Effect! It's not first-person, but it's a much better shooter than most pure shooters are.[/QUOTE]Mass Effect is a nice game by itself, but the action isn't a strong part of it. There is no hit system in Mass Effect, so it doesn't matter if you hit the head or the feet. Mass Effect has in no way better action than most shooters. However to answer the OPs question: System Shock 2BioshockDeus ExFallout 3 (can customize appearance too) [/QUOTE] I disagree. Doom doesn't have a hit detection system, and it's still way better than most shooters out today. Hit detection system does not equal good shooter. I had more fun with Mass Effect's combat than I did most shooters I've played. Certainly, Mass Effect had far, far better shooting than did any of the games you listed. [/QUOTE]None of the games I listed are pure shooters, and doom is over 15 years old, where you always just aim straight forward in the same direction that your target is in. I loved doom, but it doesn't really compete with todays games.Of course hit detection system doesn't equal good shooter, but every good shooter should have it. Especially if it doesn't have any other elements than shooting.
[QUOTE=''sp1r1t''][QUOTE=''succulent_toes''][QUOTE=''sp1r1t''][QUOTE=''succulent_toes'']Mass Effect! It's not first-person, but it's a much better shooter than most pure shooters are.[/QUOTE]Mass Effect is a nice game by itself, but the action isn't a strong part of it. There is no hit system in Mass Effect, so it doesn't matter if you hit the head or the feet. Mass Effect has in no way better action than most shooters. However to answer the OPs question: System Shock 2BioshockDeus ExFallout 3 (can customize appearance too) [/QUOTE] I disagree. Doom doesn't have a hit detection system, and it's still way better than most shooters out today. Hit detection system does not equal good shooter. I had more fun with Mass Effect's combat than I did most shooters I've played. Certainly, Mass Effect had far, far better shooting than did any of the games you listed. [/QUOTE] None of the games I listed are pure shooters, and doom is over 15 years old, where you always just aim straight forward in the same direction that your target is in. I loved doom, but it doesn't really compete with todays games.Of course hit detection system doesn't equal good shooter, but every good shooter should have it. Especially if it doesn't have any other elements than shooting. [/QUOTE]OK, then let's put it this way: a shooter can still be good even without a hit detection system. Are you seriously saying that a shooter without a hit detection system can't be good? The greatest example of this is Team Fortress 2. Besides the sniper class, the game doesn't feature headshots. Whether you shoot them in the face or in the legs or at the body, it's all the same, as long as the bullets hit the target. And that game is more fun to play, imo, than any FPS currently available (do your thing, Left 4 Dead!!!). And yes, none of the games you listed are pure shooters, so then why do you contest my Mass Effect suggestion and list these games that have subpar shooting? You're not being very consistent, mate.And Doom is more fun to play even today than most shooters, in my opinion. I have more fun playing Doom 2 with mouselook than I do almost all games except perhaps a handful. Even without mouselook, I think it's still more fun to play than 80% of the FPS. And if you think you just shoot what's directly in front of you in Doom, you're seriously mistaken. You're often put in situations where you have to go inside a room and enemies attack you from all sides. You often have monsters appearing from behind you. And even the corridors are usually pretty wide, so you're forced to shoot in many directions. You seem to be misremembering the game, mate. Perhaps it's time for a refresher!!! :)
[QUOTE=''succulent_toes''][QUOTE=''sp1r1t''][QUOTE=''succulent_toes''][QUOTE=''sp1r1t''][QUOTE=''succulent_toes'']Mass Effect! It's not first-person, but it's a much better shooter than most pure shooters are.[/QUOTE]Mass Effect is a nice game by itself, but the action isn't a strong part of it. There is no hit system in Mass Effect, so it doesn't matter if you hit the head or the feet. Mass Effect has in no way better action than most shooters. However to answer the OPs question: System Shock 2BioshockDeus ExFallout 3 (can customize appearance too) [/QUOTE] I disagree. Doom doesn't have a hit detection system, and it's still way better than most shooters out today. Hit detection system does not equal good shooter. I had more fun with Mass Effect's combat than I did most shooters I've played. Certainly, Mass Effect had far, far better shooting than did any of the games you listed. [/QUOTE]None of the games I listed are pure shooters, and doom is over 15 years old, where you always just aim straight forward in the same direction that your target is in. I loved doom, but it doesn't really compete with todays games.Of course hit detection system doesn't equal good shooter, but every good shooter should have it. Especially if it doesn't have any other elements than shooting. [/QUOTE]OK, then let's put it this way: a shooter can still be good even without a hit detection system. Are you seriously saying that a shooter without a hit detection system can't be good? And yes, none of the games you listed are pure shooters, so then why do you contest my Mass Effect suggestion and list these games that have subpar shooting? You're not being very consistent, mate. And Doom is more fun to play even today than most shooters today, in my opinion. I have more fun playing Doom 2 with mouselook than I do almost all games except perhaps a handful. Even without mouselook, I think it's still more fun to play than 80% of the FPS. [/QUOTE]Damn you got me there. I really can't list much of pure shooters with subpar shooting, since I probably wouldn't be playing them if the shooting was only subpar, because then it would mean the game would be pretty boring compared to much else on the market (being a pure shooter with rather boring shooting doesn't really make a great game).I guess you could say Kane and Lynch has subpar shooting maybe, and I've played it. But that's because it has co-op, and I love co-op. I can't really say I remember a particular pure shooter that has worse action than Mass Effect, at least not at the moment (I'm sure there is though).I'll just leave it at that Mass Effect has mediocre action. At least it wouldn't qualify as good or awesome action for me, since titles like Max Payne, Half Life, Soldier of Fortune 1, Call of Duty and Dead Space (well actually Dead Space has isn't maybe a pure shooter, but the action is still awesome) qualify as good or awesome in the shooting action department.
[QUOTE=''sp1r1t'']I'll just leave it at that Mass Effect has mediocre action. At least it wouldn't qualify as good or awesome action for me, since titles like Max Payne, Half Life, Soldier of Fortune 1, Call of Duty and Dead Space (well actually Dead Space has isn't maybe a pure shooter, but the action is still awesome) qualify as good or awesome in the shooting action department.[/QUOTE] We'll just agree to disagree on that then, since I thought the shooting was fantastic. :P
[QUOTE=''bkrawk'']rainbow six vegas 2 had character customization[/QUOTE]Yeah, Vegas 2 is a good one.
Unreal - the original game, allowed you to choose from different characters. Jedi Academy - allows you to choose from races and different clothing styles (and you can see your character in 3rd person during melee combat and cut scenes).Deus Ex - limited character appearance selection (you can see your character during dialogue with NPCs).Unfortunately, most character appearance selection in FPS games is available for multiplayer - such as MoH:Allied Assault, Unreal Tournament series, and the different skins for classes in Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory, CoD 2, CoD 4, Team Fortress 2, etc.
[QUOTE=''sp1r1t'']OK, then let's put it this way: a shooter can still be good even without a hit detection system. Are you seriously saying that a shooter without a hit detection system can't be good? The greatest example of this is Team Fortress 2. Besides the sniper class, the game doesn't feature headshots. Whether you shoot them in the face or in the legs or at the body, it's all the same, as long as the bullets hit the target. And that game is more fun to play, imo, than any FPS currently available (do your thing, Left 4 Dead!!!). And yes, none of the games you listed are pure shooters, so then why do you contest my Mass Effect suggestion and list these games that have subpar shooting? You're not being very consistent, mate.And Doom is more fun to play even today than most shooters, in my opinion. I have more fun playing Doom 2 with mouselook than I do almost all games except perhaps a handful. Even without mouselook, I think it's still more fun to play than 80% of the FPS. And if you think you just shoot what's directly in front of you in Doom, you're seriously mistaken. You're often put in situations where you have to go inside a room and enemies attack you from all sides. You often have monsters appearing from behind you. And even the corridors are usually pretty wide, so you're forced to shoot in many directions. You seem to be misremembering the game, mate. Perhaps it's time for a refresher!!! :)[/QUOTE]Ummmmmm Team Fortress 2 does in deed have headshots using the sniper rifle. There's an achievement for it too... shame on you. Actually a hit system is needed for any semi-modern FPS. Games like Doom didn't have it because they are really old and devs back then probably couldn't put hit systems in. Remember how Doom is not true 3D... the user cannot effectively aim for a body part. Prehaps you need a refresher!