Which is the best game??

What do you think is the best game of these three choices? Dead Space, Gears of War, or Bioshock?Which is the best game??
Dead Space was fantastic. Gears of War and Bioshock are on the wrong side of mediocre.Which is the best game??
excuse me, bioshock is amazing
Dead Space without question.BioShock and Gears are both poor games.
Actually, I thought both Dead Space and Bioshock were largely disappointing/overrated/mediocre, but that's mainly because they borrowed too heavily from better games.Dead Space's great gameplay was too repetitive, and Bioshock had slightly better story, pacing and artstyle, so I'd go with Bioshock.
I'd say it's between Dead Space and Gears of War, unless you really like the art/story design of Bioshock. Gears of War has a great multiplayer to back it, but Dead Space wins singleplayer hands down, not that Gears of War singleplayer is bad.
Dead Space is better than Bioshock imo. I have never played Gears of War.
Dead Space.
[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
[QUOTE=''GamerMike1979'']What do you think is the best game of these three choices? Dead Space, Gears of War, or Bioshock?[/QUOTE]I have beaten Bioshock and Gears of War and have started Dead Space and from ym experience Bioshock was the best out of the three.
I'd say Dead Space.
Bioshock - no matter what people say about it in regards to SS2 it offers a far more cinematic experience.
BioShock.
Dead Space.
[QUOTE=''biggest_loser'']Bioshock - no matter what people say about it in regards to SS2 it offers a far more cinematic experience. [/QUOTE] If it were a movie, that might count for something! hedgehogenstein doesn't see why a game being 'cinematic' is necessarily a good thing. It's a game, how well it plays is what matters. I mean, right?
[QUOTE=''hedgehogenstein''][QUOTE=''biggest_loser'']Bioshock - no matter what people say about it in regards to SS2 it offers a far more cinematic experience. [/QUOTE] If it were a movie, that might count for something! hedgehogenstein doesn't see why a game being 'cinematic' is necessarily a good thing. It's a game, how well it plays is what matters. I mean, right?[/QUOTE]While I agree a game does not need to be cinematic to be good there is an appeal to some people, such as myself, that a cinematic game can suck you into it in a way some non cinematic games can't.
[QUOTE=''Jade_Monkey''][QUOTE=''hedgehogenstein''] [QUOTE=''biggest_loser'']Bioshock - no matter what people say about it in regards to SS2 it offers a far more cinematic experience. [/QUOTE] If it were a movie, that might count for something! hedgehogenstein doesn't see why a game being 'cinematic' is necessarily a good thing. It's a game, how well it plays is what matters. I mean, right?[/QUOTE]While I agree a game does not need to be cinematic to be good there is an appeal to some people, such as myself, that a cinematic game can suck you into it in a way some non cinematic games can't. [/QUOTE] As true as that is, I think it's only relevant when the gameplay elements are made with that in mind. To use BioShock as an example, its silly and often terrible gameplay mechanics undermine any immersive effect the cinematic quality might have had. For this hedgehog, anyway. It may feel like a film (at times), but it still plays like a game, and not a very good one.I think a better example of a cinematic game is Max Payne or Mass Effect. The cinematic quality isn't undermined by deeply flawed gameplay in those games.