They are exactly the same as for Crysis link We can just hope that it'll run better than Crysis.CPU: Intel Pentium 4 2.8 GHz (3.2 GHz for Vista), Intel Core 2.0 GHz
(2.2 GHz for Vista), AMD Athlon 2800+ (3200+ for Vista) or better
RAM: 1GB (1.5GB on Windows Vista)
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT, ATI Radeon 9800 Pro
(Radeon X800 Pro for Vista) or better
VRAM: 256MB of Graphics MemoryStorage: 15GB
Sound Card: DirectX 9.0c CompatibleODD: DVD-ROM
OS: Microsoft Windows XP with Service Pack 2 or Microsoft Vista
DirectX: DX9.0c or DX10 Crysis Warhead system requirements
i think all the specifications provided by crytek is fake.crysis itself requires multi core processor,better if run on quad core,8800 gtx and above,4gb ram.so i think crysis warhead will be the same as crysis.Crysis Warhead system requirements
[QUOTE=''thomaskw'']i think all the specifications provided by crytek is fake.crysis itself requires multi core processor,better if run on quad core,8800 gtx and above,4gb ram.so i think crysis warhead will be the same as crysis.[/QUOTE]WTF? You don't need all that to run Crysis.
sorry.forgot to mention that whose specification are for high settings.
barely running crysis isn't good enough.what re ur pc specifications?
[QUOTE=''thomaskw'']sorry.forgot to mention that whose specification are for high settings.[/QUOTE] Well than how can those specs be fake when there the miniumum requirements ? You don't make alot of sense
come on.u know that with those low requirements,u can barely run crysis.i personally tested them and it kind of sucks to say that it does not serve its purpose to play crysis.do u agree?
[QUOTE=''thomaskw'']come on.u know that with those low requirements,u can barely run crysis.i personally tested them and it kind of sucks to say that it does not serve its purpose to play crysis.do u agree?[/QUOTE] My old 7600GT could run crysis on almost all medium so a 6800GT and above isn't really that bad at all. And notice how it says minimum ? Of course there not going to be amazing and I play games for gameplay, not for eyecandy. To me most people just see crysis as a gaming benchmark which is kinda shallow.... So nope I don't agree and the whole point of this thread was to basically guess that its going to be as optimized as the first.
[QUOTE=''thomaskw'']barely running crysis isn't good enough.what re ur pc specifications?[/QUOTE]Who, me?I've got a dual-core 3GHz processor, an 8600 GT 512mb, and 2GB RAM. I'm on XP, BTW.
true but we all view it in our ways and sorry to say that u cannot change that.
[QUOTE=''thomaskw'']true but we all view it in our ways and sorry to say that u cannot change that.[/QUOTE] I don't want to change anything and respect others opinions so once again what are you talking about ? One thing I hate is when people (espically in systemwars) overhype the crap out of the requirements when a $110 8800GT can play it on very high settings at a lower resolution.
[QUOTE=''thomaskw'']true but we all view it in our ways and sorry to say that u cannot change that.[/QUOTE]But the view a graphics whore takes on requirements or how good a game has to look before it's worth playing is irrelevant. Their opinion, simply put, doesn't matter.
let's cut the crap.it's all about preference.
[QUOTE=''JP_Russell''] [QUOTE=''thomaskw'']true but we all view it in our ways and sorry to say that u cannot change that.[/QUOTE]But the view a graphics whore takes on requirements or how good a game has to look before it's worth playing is irrelevant. Their opinion, simply put, doesn't matter.[/QUOTE] There alot of truth in that
[QUOTE=''mastershake575''][QUOTE=''JP_Russell''] [QUOTE=''thomaskw'']true but we all view it in our ways and sorry to say that u cannot change that.[/QUOTE]But the view a graphics whore takes on requirements or how good a game has to look before it's worth playing is irrelevant. Their opinion, simply put, doesn't matter.[/QUOTE] There alot of truth in that [/QUOTE]Yeah, don't get me wrong, I'm not saying their opinion is wrong or that they shouldn't be thinking that way. If that's how they feel about something for their own enjoyment, that's fine. I just don't like it when these people start spewing their opinion in everyone's eyes by saying things like you have to run Crysis on all high at some absurd resolution for it to be enjoyable (something most reasonable people who have experienced the game wouldn't agree with), all while having a stance of ''it's all about preference...'' followed by an attitude of ''...but my preference is better.''
[QUOTE=''JP_Russell''][QUOTE=''mastershake575''][QUOTE=''JP_Russell''] [QUOTE=''thomaskw'']true but we all view it in our ways and sorry to say that u cannot change that.[/QUOTE]But the view a graphics whore takes on requirements or how good a game has to look before it's worth playing is irrelevant. Their opinion, simply put, doesn't matter.[/QUOTE] There alot of truth in that [/QUOTE] all while having a stance of ''it's all about preference...'' followed by an attitude of ''...but my preference is better.''[/QUOTE] That pretty much explains this whole thread
Will this run crysis warhead on high settings?????Aspire Gemstone Blue 6935G
- Intel?CoreTM 2 Duo processor T9400
(2.53GHz, 6MB Level 2 Cache, 1066MHz FSB)
- 4GB DD3 1066MHz (2x2GB)
- Blu-ray DiscTM Super Multi double-layer drive
- NVIDIA?GeForce?9600M GT with up to 2303MB of TurboCacheTM (512 MB of dedicated GDDR3 VRAM)
- Display 1366 x 768 LCD
- Windows Vista Ultimate
[QUOTE=''muncher65''] Will this run crysis warhead on high settings?????Aspire Gemstone Blue 6935G
- Intel?CoreTM 2 Duo processor T9400
(2.53GHz, 6MB Level 2 Cache, 1066MHz FSB)
- 4GB DD3 1066MHz (2x2GB)
- Blu-ray DiscTM Super Multi double-layer drive
- NVIDIA?GeForce?9600M GT with up to 2303MB of TurboCacheTM (512 MB of dedicated GDDR3 VRAM)
- Display 1366 x 768 LCD
- Windows Vista Ultimate [/QUOTE]You'll probably have to lower a few settings down to mainstream at that res. That's in DX9. In DX10, you'll probably have to play at most or all mainstream settings.
Eh, probably. Especially since the resolution isn't that high. But, I'm not too sure how different the 9600M GT is with teh 9600GT. All I know is that the 9600M GT is for laptops, but they should be close. The 9600GT should be more powerful though. At the worst you'll be playing with everything on high except maybe a few stuff on medium.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment